<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Profundity N'Stuff.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://squeedlyspooch.org/an/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://squeedlyspooch.org/an</link>
	<description>Wanking Philosophical on Television and Other Things Worthy of Squee.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:58:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World &#8211; A Non-Spoilery Review by Tweets that mention Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World – A Non-Spoilery Review : Profundity N’Stuff. -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://squeedlyspooch.org/an/?p=127&#038;cpage=1#comment-1291</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World – A Non-Spoilery Review : Profundity N’Stuff. -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squeedlyspooch.org/an/?p=127#comment-1291</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Nicole H, deadfashionista. deadfashionista said: Blog Update - Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World: A Non-Spoilery Review - http://is.gd/dNQov [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Nicole H, deadfashionista. deadfashionista said: Blog Update &#8211; Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World: A Non-Spoilery Review &#8211; <a href="http://is.gd/dNQov" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/dNQov</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hollywood is losing money because you&#8217;re an asshole. by cabri</title>
		<link>http://squeedlyspooch.org/an/?p=113&#038;cpage=1#comment-1193</link>
		<dc:creator>cabri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squeedlyspooch.org/an/?p=113#comment-1193</guid>
		<description>Believe it or not I carefully fixed my &quot;they&#039;re&quot; typo to be that &quot;their&quot; typo. GAH!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Believe it or not I carefully fixed my &#8220;they&#8217;re&#8221; typo to be that &#8220;their&#8221; typo. GAH!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hollywood is losing money because you&#8217;re an asshole. by cabri</title>
		<link>http://squeedlyspooch.org/an/?p=113&#038;cpage=1#comment-1192</link>
		<dc:creator>cabri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squeedlyspooch.org/an/?p=113#comment-1192</guid>
		<description>LOL! Luckily I go mostly during weekdays when their are fewer assholes. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL! Luckily I go mostly during weekdays when their are fewer assholes. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hollywood is losing money because you&#8217;re an asshole. by darcy</title>
		<link>http://squeedlyspooch.org/an/?p=113&#038;cpage=1#comment-1184</link>
		<dc:creator>darcy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squeedlyspooch.org/an/?p=113#comment-1184</guid>
		<description>I had completely forgotten about the Home Alone/Die Hard incident. Rargh. You have serious problems if you&#039;re going to make out with baby Macaulay Culkin on screen. *shudder*

Another one: Don&#039;t sit in the front row of the balcony and stretch every five minutes during the action scenes. (Daybreakers, again.) I honestly don&#039;t know what it is about North Americans that makes them so excessively ignorant of cinema-going etiquette. &gt;.&lt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had completely forgotten about the Home Alone/Die Hard incident. Rargh. You have serious problems if you&#8217;re going to make out with baby Macaulay Culkin on screen. *shudder*</p>
<p>Another one: Don&#8217;t sit in the front row of the balcony and stretch every five minutes during the action scenes. (Daybreakers, again.) I honestly don&#8217;t know what it is about North Americans that makes them so excessively ignorant of cinema-going etiquette. >.<</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hollywood is losing money because you&#8217;re an asshole. by Nicole</title>
		<link>http://squeedlyspooch.org/an/?p=113&#038;cpage=1#comment-1183</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squeedlyspooch.org/an/?p=113#comment-1183</guid>
		<description>Ooh ooh! I want to add &quot;don&#039;t suck face through the whole movie you paid actual money for (Home Alone/Die Hard, I think that was, even more wtf), and don&#039;t do it so loudly I can hear it OVER THE MOVIE&quot;.

BLARRRRGH.

OOH! And don&#039;t answer your phone and chat during a film so it ruins the entire first experience of seeing a film i&#039;ve been waiting aaaaages for (30 Days of Night).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooh ooh! I want to add &#8220;don&#8217;t suck face through the whole movie you paid actual money for (Home Alone/Die Hard, I think that was, even more wtf), and don&#8217;t do it so loudly I can hear it OVER THE MOVIE&#8221;.</p>
<p>BLARRRRGH.</p>
<p>OOH! And don&#8217;t answer your phone and chat during a film so it ruins the entire first experience of seeing a film i&#8217;ve been waiting aaaaages for (30 Days of Night).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Don’t judge a book by its cover… But feel free to judge a TV show by its title sequence. (Part 2) by Don&#8217;t judge a book by its cover&#8230; But feel free to judge a TV show by its title sequence. (Part 1) : Profundity N&#8217;Stuff.</title>
		<link>http://squeedlyspooch.org/an/?p=58&#038;cpage=1#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t judge a book by its cover&#8230; But feel free to judge a TV show by its title sequence. (Part 1) : Profundity N&#8217;Stuff.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squeedlyspooch.org/an/?p=58#comment-33</guid>
		<description>[...] Don’t judge a book by its cover… But feel free to judge a TV show by its title sequence. (Part 2... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Don’t judge a book by its cover… But feel free to judge a TV show by its title sequence. (Part 2&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Don&#8217;t judge a book by its cover&#8230; But feel free to judge a TV show by its title sequence. (Part 1) by Don’t judge a book by its cover… But feel free to judge a TV show by its title sequence. (Part 2) : Profundity N&#8217;Stuff.</title>
		<link>http://squeedlyspooch.org/an/?p=49&#038;cpage=1#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Don’t judge a book by its cover… But feel free to judge a TV show by its title sequence. (Part 2) : Profundity N&#8217;Stuff.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squeedlyspooch.org/an/?p=49#comment-32</guid>
		<description>[...] Don&#8217;t judge a book by its cover&#8230; But feel free to judge a TV show by its title sequence.... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Don&#8217;t judge a book by its cover&#8230; But feel free to judge a TV show by its title sequence&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sci-Fi Necrolepsy: I was only a little bit dead. by Raising a daughter in the digital era &#124; Vicarious Conversations</title>
		<link>http://squeedlyspooch.org/an/?p=19&#038;cpage=1#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Raising a daughter in the digital era &#124; Vicarious Conversations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 00:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squeedlyspooch.org/an/?p=19#comment-17</guid>
		<description>[...] I raise a monster? A psychopath?  No, I raised a film and tv critic, with bachelors and masters degrees. Oh, and one of her majors was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I raise a monster? A psychopath?  No, I raised a film and tv critic, with bachelors and masters degrees. Oh, and one of her majors was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on From The Beatles to Aphexx Twin: An Eisensteinian Approach to Music Video as Text by Don&#8217;t judge a book by its cover&#8230; But feel free to judge a TV show by its title sequence. (Part 1) : Alas, not made of cheesecake.</title>
		<link>http://squeedlyspooch.org/an/?page_id=12&#038;cpage=1#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t judge a book by its cover&#8230; But feel free to judge a TV show by its title sequence. (Part 1) : Alas, not made of cheesecake.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 23:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squeedlyspooch.org/an/?page_id=12#comment-16</guid>
		<description>[...] not interested in film theory) story, but if you want to know more, my essay on the subject is here. I&#8217;ve also recently found Art of the Title which goes beyond the restrictions I&#8217;ve set [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not interested in film theory) story, but if you want to know more, my essay on the subject is here. I&#8217;ve also recently found Art of the Title which goes beyond the restrictions I&#8217;ve set [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Market Research &#8211; A Statistic Is You! by Lioness</title>
		<link>http://squeedlyspooch.org/an/?p=26&#038;cpage=1#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Lioness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squeedlyspooch.org/an/?p=26#comment-15</guid>
		<description>I took part in one of those once. Never again. If it had really been a TV show they were testing, it would have been at least a bit interesting. But I felt insulted. They thought I was so stupid I wouldn&#039;t catch on that it was all about the ads?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took part in one of those once. Never again. If it had really been a TV show they were testing, it would have been at least a bit interesting. But I felt insulted. They thought I was so stupid I wouldn&#8217;t catch on that it was all about the ads?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
